Substantive morality of Constitution in the context of the right to freedom of speech and expression would mean fixing the ambit of this right with precision. The most important goal of constitutional morality, however, to quote, Sujit Chaudhary, Madadhav Khosla and Pratap Bhanu Mehta is “to avoid revolution, to turn to constitutional methods for the resolution of claims.”[1] This constitutional morality of ‘form’ or ‘procedure’ is the condition precedent for a debate on substantive constitution morality. Padmavati, the movie is yet to be considered by the Board of Film Certification (hereinafter referred to as Board) which is popularly called the Censor Board,[2] a statutory body ordained by the law[3] passed by the Parliament of India to perform the task of sanctioning films for public exhibition and we have the few State Governments having already expressed their desire to not allow the movie to be screened in their respective States. It is to be noted that the Board of Film Certification is not only a film certifying authority for different kinds of audience, rather it has the power to ask to excisions and modifications or it can altogether refuse to sanction a film for public exhibition.