If one reads this Times of India report carefully, starting with the headline, it seems like the reporter's interpretation of what Prashant Bhushan said became a fact, rather than what Bhushan actually said. Did he say the AAP forming the Delhi government was undemocratic or that the BJP being left out despite being the single largest party was undemocratic? Already, Sheila Dikshit has been asked for her opinion on Prashant Bhushan "saying forming the government was undemocratic".