Sharper reporting on NGOs needed
There are many issues pertaining to and arising from the functioning of NGOs which are worthy of greater focus.We need more balanced and incisive media coverage of this sector.
SEEN BUT NOT HEARD
Lalitha Sridhar
Non Government Organizations (NGOs) and their substantial contribution to the many endemic problems India faces are about the only area where the media reports frequently and inspiringly on issues that matter. We are cheered and moved by the commitment and sheer hard work put in by those countless - and mostly nameless - activists/social workers who dedicate their lives to causes which are often larger than individuals and institutions. That, however, is the visible, brighter side of the coin. What lies on the other side? Do we - and should we not - have the will to find out?
There are many issues pertaining to and arising from the functioning of NGOs which are worthy of greater focus. Today, most of the reporting on the work of NGOs tends to be laudatory and follows a set pattern of highlighting selfless determination and heartwarming achievements. Like most of my tribe, I too remain a superficial spectator who happens to write about what she is told. In view of the fact that this country has close to 8,000 NGOs spearheading reforms in virtually every sector, even as they handle substantial funds, it appears more than a little discouraging to note that no incisive mainstream writing is to be found on the larger, macro-perspectives common to all these organizations.
Reporting Red-tapism : It is all but taken for
granted that NGOs in India face all the usual hassles inflicted by a boorish
babudom. What are the draconian processes which hinder their smooth functioning
and distract their workers in an unwarranted fashion? It is essential that NGO
initiatives which are crucial to many core development issues should not be
bogged down by time-consuming paperwork and irrelevant requirements. Can not
media coverage of needless, regulatory red-tapism address the need to explore
viable alternatives?
Exploiting the Exploited : This writer was once an invitee on a naval
trip-on-a-ship jamboree to which a hundred odd children belonging to an
orphanage, affiliated to a famous nodal funding body, were invited. The parent
organisation’s popularity and credentials were impeccable but the beneficiary
institution could not be termed beyond reproach. At the height of summer, the
children, every single one of them, were brought minus any footwear whatsoever.
They were uniformly dressed in rags in what appeared to be an exercise in
laying their dignity to tatters. Their chaperones loudly requested that some
food be served for their hungry dozens and went on to the larger, lead ship,
abandoning half the children with no escort to the vessel which brought up the
rear. Over a long day of seasickness and sunburn, there was not a soul in sight
to supervise and educate the children, some of whom fell asleep on the burning
deck. At the penultimate press meet, the children parroted what were obviously
rehearsed answers. The language was formal and non-colloquial; only specific
children were invited to speak. Sample : (hand taken pleadingly) "Akka,
you must help us. The orphanage people are very good but sometimes we are
hungry because there isn’t enough food." The following morning’s media
reports showered accolades on both the NGO and the Navy, while one was left
wondering who would look into the thoughts of the forgotten key players - the
children.
In another example, there is a branch of a very respected international medical
charity operating in Chennai’s outer suburbs which has funds sanctioned for
computers but uses only typewriters, even as it shows three workers on its
records but has employed only one. In another case, an adoption activist found
it impossible to convince a privately run orphanage to find new, permanent
homes for its wards. The reason? They needed to show larger numbers in their
register in order