Second Take
Kalpana Sharma
Peace talk, at least on this side of the border, seems to have taken a break. After an initial rush of articles and events, launched on January 1 by The Times of India as part of its Aman Ki Asha, when several pages were devoted to articles advocating peace with
On the other side of the border, its partner the Jang Group also launched a similar campaign. But in the course of the three months that the campaign has run, the difference is apparent.
While TOI seems to have run out of steam, perhaps temporarily, The News, the Jang group’s English daily, is going great guns. In fact, the variety of features and articles carried on its Aman Ki Asha pages surpass those in TOI both in terms of quality and innovation.
One of the most innovative efforts is the Conversations between Mumbai-based writer and journalist Dilip D’Souza and Beena Sarwar, well-known Pakistani journalist and peace activist who is currently managing the Aman Ki Asha pages for The News. These conversations take place through an email exchange between the two journalists. They touch on issues that all of us think about but often do not express.
In the latest Conversation, D’Souza asks: "Why has the relationship between our countries come to be defined by people who are fundamentally antagonistic and vengeful? Is it something intrinsic to the very existence of
To which, Sarwar responds: "I agree that we need to define the relationship between our countries -- 'we' as in people like you and me, rather than those who are ‘fundamentally antagonistic and vengeful’. Certainly, even if it has always been that way, now is the time to change that. If sane voices have an equal playing field and reach the people, the call to resolve all issues through dialogue will prevail over those who routinely use aggression to sabotage peace."
Perhaps this exchange is not highly original, particularly between two people who have been associated with peace efforts. But the very fact that these thoughts appear in a form that anyone can read and access make them interesting • regardless of the impact they might have.
What has made an impact are some of the other articles that have appeared in The News as part of Aman Ki Asha. One particularly remarkable piece is written by Perwez Abdullah titled "When the enemy isn’t". The article contains a first hand account "of how Indian soldiers, bound by the ties of ethnicity rather than religion, helped and protected a community of fellow-Biharis in newly liberated
However, while we on this side of the border would find the article interesting, it has stirred up controversy on the other side, given that it is presenting the Indian army with a human face. As a result, the rival of The News, the hawkish English newspaper The Nation, ran a front page piece the next day headlined: "Is India using Pak media for nefarious designs?" . It went on to suggest that the joint peace initiative by TOI and the Jang group was "showing the first signs of turning into a propaganda tool for the Indian establishment…instead of giving equal airtime and print space to viewpoints from both countries, the initiative has become a one-way traffic of Indian official propaganda peddled as ‘peace stories’ that highlight Indian policy priorities or force Pakistani writers and artists to seek Indian patronage." What seems to have offended The Nation more than the story about the Indian soldiers saving Bihari Muslims in
While ethnic ties over-ruling religious differences is not beyond the realm of credibility in the India Pakistan context, The Nation believes that emphasizing this is a deliberate ploy. "The implicit theme was that geographic and cultural links to some Indian states should be more important than religious links to
The response by The Nation is indicative of the thorny path that
It is significant that while the Aman Ki Asha efforts by TOI in
By way of contrast, The News in