Wah India - Funky Sizzle

IN Media Practice | 31/08/2002
Wah India - Funky Sizzle

Wah India - Funky Sizzle

Mannika Chopra

For some, this magazine¿s approach is feisty, fearless and provocative. For others it¿s simply gossipy, risqué, sensation-driven journalism, with an editorial line that wears its regional chauvinism on its sleeve.

Madhu Trehan speaks softly, rapidly. In a gravelly voice, Wah India¿s editor-in-chief apologises for appointments made and not kept citing her current preoccupations with lawyers. Trehan¿s whole persona-- a lithe, worked out physique, clothed in a hip turquoise and pink kurta, conversation punctuated by sips of Diet Coke and drags of a low nicotine cigarette -- and that of her office -- chrome yellow and electric blue walls, peopled by youngsters apparently not old enough to buy beer--is funky. It also conforms completely with the personality of ¿Wah India.¿


The magazine launched in December 2000 is actually an off spring and carbon copy of the broadband web site that preceded it six months earlier. It forms a part of a larger multi-media Wah India family that includes a FM radio station and a TV production house "We thought that a print edition of the site would attract today¿s non-reader who doesn¿t look at ¿India Today¿ or ¿Outlook¿ but needs an alternative venue of information rather than simply regular news, " explains Trehan.

It¿s difficult to describe or categorise Wah India. Visually overwhelming, its editorial content at first glance seems sassy accompanied with lots of silliness: Features like 50 Ways to Dump Your Lover, Red Hot Sex Postures, Take the Bitch Test, Do Women Love Bastards? abound. Call it Seventeen meets Cosmopolitan meets Star Dust meets India Today. Most of the fortnightly¿s 67 pages move away from the conventional gravitas that mark existing current affairs magazines to news that amuses; and shocks. For some, this approach is feisty, fearless and provocative. For others it¿s simply gossipy, risqué, sensational driven journalism, with an editorial line that wears its regional chauvinism on its sleeve.

Consider its latest cover story, issue dated May 1-15,2001. The cover headline shouts, ¿For Every 50 Indians there is one Bangladeshi.¿ Through a peek-a-boo hole in the overlapping cover you see an impoverished family of five (presumably Bangladeshi) squished in a cycle rickshaw. Open the overlay and that visual is surrounded by multiple images of a prosperous, middle class couple (presumably Indian) just stepping out of their modest home to go to work. The tone of the cover feature is threatening. India has limited resources which are being sucked up by illegal Bangladeshi immigrants; this a ticking time bomb. The government better do something or else. The story dovetails with another main feature on the killing of 15 Indian jawans by the Bangladeshi Rifles and a chest thumping column by K.P.S. Gill, former IG Punjab.

Of the eleven issues published at least five have tastelessly targeted Pakistan. The back page of the magazine called ¿The Last Laugh¿ (suspiciously similar to ¿The New Yorker¿s¿ Back Page) looks at issues through a cartoonist¿s prism. However instead of looking at a range of current events, Wah India appears fixated on taking cheap shots at Pakistan. A sampler. ¿Eight reasons why Miss Pakistan didn¿t win the Miss World contest.¿ Two answers will suffice-¿-She was honour killed on the way to her hotel¿; ¿Musharraf thought she would be better off doing social service to him then to the rest of the world.¿ In issue dated January 1-15,2001 Pakistan has been caricaturised as a blowsy prostitute with all the strategic places marked with suggestive captions to which even the National Commission for Women reacted strongly. (The following issue of Wah India carried a meek apology.)