IN JUDGEMENTS DATABASE |06/08/2018
Kaleesuwari Refinery Pvt. Ltd. v. M.K. Agrotech Pvt. Ltd. The High Court of Madras O.A. No. 1151 of 2015 in C.S. No. 858 of 2015 Media Involved: Advertisement Decided On: 29.02.2016 K.K. Sasidharan, J. 1. Original Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to grant an interim injunction restraining the respondent/defendant their distributors, marketers, franchisees,..
IN JUDGEMENTS DATABASE |06/08/2018
Reckitt and Colman of India Ltd. v. M. P. Ramchandran and Ors. The High Court of Calcutta 1999(19)PTC741(Cal) Media Involved: Advertisements Decided on: 24.08.1998 Barin Ghosh, J. 1. In the plaint the plaintiff has prayed, inter alia, for perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from further publishing the advertisements contained in Annexure NB' to the plaint or..
IN JUDGEMENTS DATABASE |04/08/2018
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI FAO No. 4 (SH) 2006 Decided On: 04.09.2009 Appellants: G.L. Publications Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Respondent: North Eastern Indian Trust for Education and Development (NEITED) and Ors.   Hon'ble Judges/Coram: Tinlianthang Vaiphei and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ. JUDGMENT Hrishikesh Roy, J.   1. Heard Mr. G. Choudhury, learned Counsel appearing for the appellants (defendants)...
IN JUDGEMENTS DATABASE |04/08/2018
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA Crl. M.C. No. 663 of 2012 Decided On: 13.07.2012 Appellants: Jacob Mathew and Anr. Vs. Respondent: Manikantan alias G. Mani and Anr.   Hon'ble Judges/Coram: S.S. Satheesachandran, J. ORDER S.S. Satheesachandran, J.   1. Petitioners are the accused in a pending case on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Kollam...
IN JUDGEMENTS DATABASE |04/08/2018
  The High Court of Allahabad 1998 (33) ALR 299 Media Involved: Non- Fiction Book Decided on:10.04.1998   MarkandeyKatju, J.   1. I had the advantage of perusing the judgment prepared by my learned brother Hon'ble D.K. Seth, J. However I regret my inability to agree with the same. I am of the opinion that the impugned Government..
IN JUDGEMENTS DATABASE |04/08/2018
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH (JABALPUR BENCH) W.A. No. 1130/2007 Decided On: 02.08.2007 Appellants: Rampal Ahirwar Vs. Respondent: State of M.P. and Ors.   Judges/Coram: Dipak Misra & S.R. Waghmare, JJ. Dipak Misra, J.   In this intra-court appeal preferred under Section 2(1) of the M.P. Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 the sustainability..
IN JUDGEMENTS DATABASE |04/08/2018
  THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY Citation Unavailable Media Involved: Newspaper Decided on: 18.08.2010   N.A. Britto, J.   1. The Complainant seeks special leave to appeal against the acquittal of the accused under Section 499/500 I.P.C. by Judgment/Order dated 19-3-2010 of the learned J.M.F.C., Panaji. The parties hereto shall be referred to in the names as they..
IN JUDGEMENTS DATABASE |04/08/2018
  Arun Ranjan Ghose v. The State of West Bengal The High Court of Calcutta (1957) ILR 2 Cal 396 Media Involved: Non-Fiction Book Decided on: 11.01.1955      Chakravartti, C.J.   1. This is an application under Section 99B of the Code of Criminal Procedure against an order of the State Government, dated May 14, 1954, and published on..
IN JUDGEMENTS DATABASE |04/08/2018
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD Decided On: 07.12.1880 Appellants: Empress of India Vs. Respondent: McLeod and Ors.   Hon'ble Judges/Coram: Sir Robert Stuart, Kt., C.J.   JUDGMENT Sir Robert Stuart, Kt., C.J.   1. This is an appeal from a conviction by the Magistrate of Allahabad for the offence of defamation under s. 499 of the Indian Penal..
IN JUDGEMENTS DATABASE |04/08/2018
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD Criminal Revision No. 762 of 1981 Decided On: 01.03.1982 Appellants: Mahendra Singh Vs. Respondent: State of U.P. and Anr.   Hon'ble Judges/Coram:V.N. Misra, J.   JUDGMENT V.N. Misra, J.   1. This is an application in revision by Mahendra Singh against the judgment and order dated 3-6-1981 by Sri R.A. Misra, Sessions Judge, Saharanpur..
Subscribe To The Newsletter
The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.                   

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.                 

View More