The Supreme Court’s new ruling that poll candidates and their relatives must reveal the source of their income, infringes their fundamental right to privacy
The absence of a legal framework compelling maximum disclosure by corporations on their use of customer data, is dangerous.
On at least three occasions, the Constitutional Courts protected the right to privacy of judges and the judiciary.
As an ethical hacker, my job is to help protect those who are unable, or lack the knowledge, to help themselves.
The extent and scope of intelligence agencies’ ability to intercept communications and collect information is mind-boggling.
Using classification strategies to get legal sanction for new, controversial technologies is not unique or a one-off.
Indians are routinely subjected to government surveillance on a staggering scale -7500 to 9000 telephone interception orders by the Central Government each month!
Apart from the conflation of commercial data protection and privacy, the right to privacy bill has ill-informed and poorly drafted provisions to regulate surveillance.
The absence of a statute expressing the legislative will of a democracy to forge a common understanding of privacy is a matter of concern,
The Central Monitoring System project is being tested and put in place without the sanction of a specific Act of Parliament.