Free speech campaigns in 2010

IN Media Freedom | 06/04/2010
Campaigns were launched Karnataka and Tamilnadu in support of victims of charges of sedition.

Campaigns

 

March 2010

Petition Online on charges of sedition against Karnataka PUCL activist Dr E Rati Rao

http://www.petitiononline.com/RatiRao/petition.html

To

Shri B S Yeddyurappa,

Chief Minister,

Karnataka 

 

CC: Shri Hans Raj Bharajwaj,

Governor,

Karnataka

 

Sir,

 

We the undersigned are writing to you in the backdrop of the fact that Dr E Rati Rao, a senior scientist, long-standing activist of the women’s rights movement, Vice-President of PUCL-Karnataka and Vice President of the All India Progressive Women’s Association (AIPWA) has recently been charged with sedition by the police of the state that you govern - Karnataka.   

Dr. Rati Rao was Editor of an in-house PUCL-Karnataka Kannada language bulletin (called PUCL Varthapatra) for private circulation among PUCL members – and it is this bulletin (last published in 2007) that is the supposed basis for the charges of ‘sedition’.

The FIR against Dr. Rati Rao accuses her of publishing the PUCL bulletin that is "favoring naxals and Muslims and is propagating that the police are killing innocent people in the name of encounter"; that "calls upon dalits, women, minorities, farmers and adivasis to build organizations in order to fight for their rights"; that "accuses the Sangh Parivar in Karavali (coastal Karnataka) of indulging in false propaganda and fueling communal disharmony" and "calls upon the secular forces to raise their voice against such spread of communal hate"; and "by raising such issues incite and spread intolerance, disbelief, discontent amongst the public"; that "in the name of doing good to the dalits, women, minorities, & adivasis the said bulletin is spreading false information against the casteist & communal Government…It is propagating intolerance, disbelief, and discontent amongst the Government officials." 

The sections under which Dr. Rati Rao has been booked are Section 124 A (Sedition), Section 505 (False statement, rumour, etc., circulated with intent to cause mutiny or cause communal discord) and sections of the Press Act that relate to knowingly spreading false information. The PUCL Bulletin in question had discussed the attacks on the Christian community in Karnataka and had indicted the Government for failing to do enough to protect the minority community from attack. 

Going by the FIR against Dr. Rati Rao, are we, the citizens of India, to believe that in the eyes of the BJP-ruled Karnataka today, it is ‘sedition’ to avail the basic democratic right (and duty) of resisting communal hate campaigns and extra-judicial killings by the police; of asserting secularism; of encouraging dalits, women, minorities, farmers and adivasis to organize for their rights; and of asking why the Government is failing to prevent attacks on minorities and dalits?!  Is it because the Karnataka Government itself is colluding in the attacks on women, dalits, minorities and human rights that it feels so threatened by democratic activists who take up such issues? Is the Government of Karnataka out to muzzle every voice of democracy and dissent? 

We find it ironic that while the Karnataka police does not book the Sangh outfits for spreading rumours galore of ‘love jehad’ and ‘forced conversion’ etc to target Muslims and Christians, nor for violating the Constitution by indulging in communal violence – people like Dr. Rati Rao who have devoted their lives to defending constitutional liberties are accused of sedition and activists seeking to bring facts to light are booked for ‘spreading rumour’! 

Dr Rati Rao is a scientist and researcher specializing in food microbiology, and retired as the Deputy Director of the CFTRI (Central Food Technological Research Institute). She has a history of several decades of democratic activism – first in the student movement, then in the women’s movement with the Samata Progressive Women’s Forum, Mysore since 1978 and as a prominent figure in the autonomous women’s movement right since the 1980s; and long associated with the Left and progressive movement and the human rights movement, especially the PUCL.

Why was a bulletin last published in 2007 dug out now, three years later, for punitive action by the Karnataka Government? We believe it is merely a pretext to intimidate Dr. Rati Rao, who has in recent times, as National Vice President of the All India Progressive Women’s Association (AIPWA) been visiting Karnataka villages to organize rural poor women to fight for their rights, who was recently part of a fact-finding to expose the atrocities against Dalits in Chitradurga district of Karnataka, and who recently participated in a National Convention against Sexual violence and State Repression in Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

To us it is clear that the charge against Dr. Rati Rao is part of a calculated campaign of harassment of civil liberties and democratic activists and crackdown on dissent that has marked the BJP regime in Karnataka and the ‘Operation Greenhunt’ of the central government.

We the undersigned condemn the trumped up charges against a respected member of the democratic rights and women’s movement and demand your immediate intervention to ensure that the charges be immediately withdrawn.

 

                                      * * * * * * * * * * *

January 2010

 http://www.petitiononline.com/freepiyu/petition.html

 

To:  Chief Minister, Tamil Nadu, India

To: Hon'ble Chief Minister

Government of Tamilnadu

Secretariat, Chennai 600 009

 

To: Smt. S. Malathi

Home Secretary

Government of Tamilnadu

Secretariat, Chennai 600 009

 

Sir/Madam:

 

Piyush Sethia, a prominent resident of Salem, environmentalist and organic farmer, was arrested on 26 January, 2010, and accused of sedition for attempting to distribute pamphlets outside a Republic Day function in Gandhi Stadium, Salem. The pamphlets condemned the state-sponsored violence against adivasis in Chattisgarh, and urged the Government of India and Chattisgarh to end the war against adivasis. It announced that people will not remain silent, and that a cycle yatra will be undertaken from Salem to Sivagangai (the Home Minister's constituency) to mobilise pressure on the Governments.

 

It is ironic that even as the Home Minister invites people, including the Maoists, to function within the framework of democracy and the constitution, a human rights defender who exercises his democratic responsibility to question the Government is put behind bars on trumped up charges of sedition. This does not bode well for Tamilnadu's image as a well-governed state, and certainly does not send a message that the Rule of Law prevails in this state. We hope you realise that this arrest and the charges are motivated and a misuse of law, and that you will intervene to ensure that the charges are dropped and Piyush Sethia is released with honour.

 

March 2010:

World Day Against Cyber Censorship

Reporters Without Borders will celebrate World Day Against Cyber Censorship on 12 March. This event is intended to rally everyone in support of a single Internet that is unrestricted and accessible to all.

 

It is also meant to draw attention to the fact that, by creating new spaces for exchanging ideas and information, the Internet is a force for freedom. However, more and more governments have realised this and are reacting by trying to control the Internet.

 

Reporters Without Borders will mark the occasion by issuing its latest list of "Enemies of the Internet." This list points the finger at countries such as Iran, China, Saudi Arabia, Vietnam and Tunisia that restrict online access and harass their netizens. A list of countries that have been placed "under surveillance" for displaying a disturbing attitude towards the Internet will also be released.

Click here for more details:

http://www.rsf.org/spip.php?page=article&id_article=36566

 

* * * ** * * *  

 

Subscribe To The Newsletter
The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.                   

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.                 

View More