Insensitive Indian Oprah

BY Jayshree| IN Media Practice | 29/07/2002
Insensitive Indian Oprah

Insensitive Indian Oprah

 

If there has been abuse already to the victims presented, the insensitive handling in this programme is nothing short of abuse twice over.

 

B Jayashree

Even a good idea can rub people the wrong way.

There is always a drawback to emulating someone else¿s success. People will compare. So it was when Vijay TV launched a desi version of Oprah Winfrey¿s show, with film star Lakshmi donning Oprah¿s role, the programme, from the start was in for a tough challenge.

First the plus points. "Kadai alla Nijam" (not fiction but truth) is probably the first such attempt of its kind to raise issues that have not been raised,

and to talk about sexual exploitation, medical negligence and eunuchs by directly interacting with those at the receiving end of some abuse. As in the Oprah show, the anchor is the key to this show too.

 

The first part of the programme talks to victims of those allegedly exploited; for example while addressing the issue of medical negligence, (one of the more watchable episodes) those affected by medical negligence speak out their scary / poignant stories; in the second part doctors are at the center stage, to enable them to defend themselves. During the programme, viewers can call in with their views. The attempt seems to be to bring out reality in its harshest and most brutal form.

As a programme, it takes on subjects of interest, has a very relevant variety of persons sharing experiences and seems to be making an attempt to be bold. However, now we come to why it jars. Insensitivity, an attempt to sensationalise and a prejudiced view on any issue, is visible so blatantly, that the programme would sometimes have quite the opposite effect. Not result in empathy, but dissent.

The show¿s selling point Lakshmi is probably its sorest point too. While she claims she is following a given script, the anchor has to ad-lib most of the time, and this for most part is agonizing. The tendency to moralise, jump to conclusions and be insensitive demeans the very purpose of the programme. Within ten days of its launch, Kadai Alla Nijam, has already been pulled up by the juvenile welfare board for insensitive handling of a sexually abused kid. (they did not try to mask the face of the child) Later Lakshmi held a press conference in which the child was publicly handed over to a relative, and said that this was done to prove the veracity of the subjects taken up.

However, in every episode, there are more bloomers and irritants than can be warranted, even if you make allowances for spontaneity. Here are some examples: In one episode that dealt with infertility and women bearing the brunt of blame, Lakshmi, who has a tendency to talk for her guest or put words into their mouth, would repeatedly ask the guest, how cruel her mother-in-law was to her. And most of her guests¿ replies are annotated with moral stands that she herself tries to pronounce. These comments in fact take the interest and the pace out of the bulk of the programming.

Subscribe To The Newsletter
The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.                   

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.                 

View More