The International Press Institute¿s Response To Pakistan¿s Ordinance

IN Media Practice | 01/09/2002
The International Press Institute¿s Response To Pakistan¿s Ordinance

The International Press Institute¿s Response To Pakistan¿s Ordinance


VIENNA: The International Press Institute (IPI), the global network of editors and journalists, after examining the draft Freedom of Information Ordinance 2000 of Pakistan, has recommended that the ordinance needs to be revised in accordance with international standards on access to information.

The ordinance should have the power to override other laws. Any laws conflicting with this ordinance should be amended to reflect this fact, it said. The IPI, in its initial report, also recommended that the authorities should draw together interested parties for a conference on the subject and use its results to re-draft the law, thus ensuring that all aspects of the ordinance meet with international standards.

The IPI examined the ordinance in light of international standards regarding freedom of information and whether the intended ordinance may have consequences for freedom of the media. It further recommended that the phrase classified should be defined under the ordinance. There should be a duty to publish guidelines and other information on the ordinance. The declaration of the public record should be drafted as widely as possible, it said. In order for the ordinance to meet accepted international standards, substantial amendments need to be undertaken, it said.

The IPI said this is the second draft ordinance on the issue in the last three years. In 1997, a committee drafted a freedom of information ordinance. Since 1997, the proposal for a freedom of information ordinance has been held in abeyance until this year when the present ordinance was drafted and presented to organisations inside Pakistan for their review.

 

 

Subscribe To The Newsletter
The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.                   

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.                 

View More