A changing media universe

BY ninan| IN Opinion | 02/03/2004
Old notions of national and mass no longer apply in a rapidly changing media universe.
  

                         Reprinted from the Hindu, February 29, 2004

 

 Sevanti Ninan

 MEDIA MATTERS

 Regional onslaught

 

THERE is media visible, and media invisible. For the opinion-making

  classes, the former comprises the young Turks of NDTV 24x7 and Aaj

  Tak , the self-congratulatory Times of India, the clever-clever ad films

  created in Mumbai, and the imagined sway of Tulsi and Jassi. But

  beyond the glitz of cable television and all-colour newspapers, is a

  media universe that is changing rapidly. Old notions of national and

  regional no longer apply, media access is becoming a highly unequal

  proposition in much of the country, and mass media is increasingly

  under assault from niche channels and publications.

 

  Several interesting crosscurrents are at work in the national media

  scenario. Regional stalwarts are becoming major national players. Try

  this advertising line: "One newspaper, 8 states, 279 districts, 24

  editions". That is the Dainik Jagran announcing its launch in Ludhiana

  last month. The tagline is, "First national daily to be published from

  Ludhiana". Or consider the Dainik Bhaskar, with 20 editions in eight

  States, counting down to the launch in March of its 21st edition in

  Surat. No English daily is expanding at the scorching pace of a Jagran

  or a Bhaskar.

 

  On a smaller scale, the Rajasthan Patrika has expanded into Gujarat,

  the Prabhat Khabar of Jharkhand publishes from both Kolkata and

  Bihar, the Navbharat of Maharashtra is present in Chattisgarh and

  Madhya Pradesh, and the Eenadu now has a presence in Orissa, Delhi,

  Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Mumbai besides its native Andhra

  Pradesh. In television, Sun TV`s Surya has taken on indigenous

  competition in Kerala to emerge the leader there. These rollouts

  across states are undertaken with modern day marketing savvy. In

  1997 in Jaipur, and in 2003 in Ahmedabad, the Dainik Bhaskar,

  originally from Madhya Pradesh, unleashed its door-to-door survey

  approach to entering a new market. It seems to deliver the numbers.

  Both leading Hindi newspapers are enticing advertisers with the

  multi-edition packages they have to offer. So are runners-up Hindustan

  and the Amar Ujala. The result is yet another not-so-happy media

  trend — the encapsulation of smaller, feisty regional newspapers that

  had a reputation beyond their territories. The Jansatta, the Nai Duniya,

  the Desh Bandhu, the Nav Jyoti, the Choutha Sansar, the Ranchi Express,

  and the Sanmarg, have all registered a drop in readership in the last

  few years.

 

  They cannot compete with the global-national-local formula that the

  market leaders have invented. The latter`s local editions go down to

  villages to collect and disseminate news. At last count, the Hindustan

  had 24 editions in Bihar alone. Rural India now gets newspapers in the

  morning at its doorstep.

 

  But it does not get TV. Completely contrary to the notion that

  terrestrial TV reaches more than 80 per cent of the country, the reality

  is that only 19 per cent of rural households possess TV sets. The

  readership surveys had spread the notion (on the basis of sampling)

  that this figure was 28 per cent, but Census 2001 which collected data

  on TV and radio ownership has demonstrated otherwise. NRS 2003 had

  a rural sample of 42,000 households, the census covered 138 million

  rural households. Radio ownership in rural India is around 31 per cent,

  going by census figures.

 

  Television access across the country is also skewed. In rural Bihar, only

  one out 18 households possesses a TV set. In Punjab it is likely to be

  three out of five. Eighty-four per cent of rural households in Uttar

  Pradesh do not possess a TV set. Taking rural and urban combined,

  West Bengal has seven per cent of all TV owning homes, Bihar three

  per cent, the North East three per cent, Orissa two per cent. But

  Maharashtra has 16 per cent, and the four Southern states between

  them account for 32 per cent of all TV homes in the country (NRS

  2002). And by studying census data for comparison, Doordarshan`s

  former director for audience research, B.S. Chandrasekhar, who has

  recently done a study of rural TV ownership, has concluded that NRS

  figures are usually overestimates.

 

  Cable penetration is also skewed, varying from seven per cent for

  West Bengal to as high as between 70 and 85 per cent for Tamil Nadu,

  Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh. Again, this is according to NRS

  estimates. So regional is increasingly becoming national, States are

  developing media rich and media poor identities, and as India

  progresses towards becoming a mature media market, niche media is

  eating into the audience share of mass media.

 

  Among niche publications, business periodicals make up 62 per cent of

  the niche market, sustained by growing volumes of financial

  advertising. This is followed by womens` magazines, film magazines,

  education and career, travel, IT, automobile and other periodicals.

  Over the last decade, general interest magazines have lost five per

  cent of their revenues to specialist magazines, according to the TAM

  ADEX analysis on Exchange4media.com. But they in turn have cut

  marginally into the advertising revenues of newspapers. In TV, niche

  channels are increasingly garnering audience shares. The trend is

  borne out what is happening elsewhere: last year in the United

  Kingdom, the five traditional TV networks were overtaken in viewership

  ratings for the first time by the combined might of smaller, specialist

  channels. In India, niche channels are flourishing, and if you take

  regional TV as niche, those channels now command over 40 per cent

  of cable audience. Super niche regional channels are likely to grow,

  there is now one for Coorg, two or more are starting up in Andhra

  Pradesh this year, and Aastha TV has two Sindhi channels for

  audiences in India and Pakistan.

 

  As the trend grows, some niche channels will attract advertising out of

  proportion to their viewership. The "History" channel came in on the

  Star platform claiming to be in 15 million homes from the outset.

  Reality TV is also here, and when a Hindi business channel starts up

  later this year, that too will take advertising away from others.

 

  Therefore, in the context of media, concepts of "national" and "mass"

  are changing rapidly. At the same time, the hype notwithstanding,

  large parts of the country remain immune to media influence. The

  "India Shining" promoters might like to think about that.

TAGS
universe
Subscribe To The Newsletter
The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.                   

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.                 

View More