Double standards

IN Opinion | 21/11/2013
Alleged sexual harasment by a retired supreme court justice is news. Snooping on a woman by at the behest of state government ministers is news. But repeat sexual harassment (admitted to) of a staffer by the magazine's editor is not news. For either The Hindu, or The Times of India. It is, according to the managing editor of the magazine, "an internal matter." The Hindustan Times had in the middle of page 8. Business Standard had a brief on page 12. Why these double standards? And is the Editors’ Guild going to be heard from on this issue?
Subscribe To The Newsletter
The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.                   

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.                 

View More