Letter: activists are not amused

IN Opinion | 22/09/2004
A Child rights activist objects to advertising depicting child labour
 

 

 

One more child labourer for one more wicket and one more Pepsi & one more case of child abuse for Coffee Bite.

Children sell and a child sells. So, put children in any form to sell your product is a time-tested formula for the ad world. Ad agencies and companies  have been using children in advertisements and campaigns. In the recent past, child rights activists  had protested the use of children in advertisements in bad light and taste.

 ·  Hero Honda - using shoe shine children

 ·  Warehouse - slapping a street child to show the
 attitude.

Now, the advertisements on the most powerful TV media  have come back, abusing child rights. Pepsi has come back with a child labourer serving the drink to the Indian cricket team. The multinational company is making a desperate bid to grab the attention of the middle class and especially, that of children.  We protest using a child as a server/supplier/labourer  taking Pepsi to the "Indian Cricket Team".

India is a signatory to the Convention on the Rights  of the Child and is committed to put an end to child  labour in any form. (Article 32)

The ad also shows the child using a dangerous way to  reach the team, and the team waiting for the child to come and serve the drink. A multi national company has made the completely Indian team, thereby the whole of
India endorsing the use of child labour.

It is neither amusing nor encouraging. We urge the  immediate withdrawal of the advertisement from all the channels and all media and the issue of a public apology for using children in bad shape and violating the rights of the children.

Coffee Bite , a Parry product, in its new TV ad  campaign makes a child to behave like an adult and even utter a foul word to describe a woman. This is a violation of the rights of the children. Media has a role and responsibility in safe guarding the rights of the child (Article 13  and 17 of CRC - not to use the  media to undermine the dignity of children and  harm the sense of morality.)


The ad is not a joke and should be taken very seriously by all those who believe in upholding the rights of the children.

We protest the use of children in this bad light and   urge   the immediate   withdrawal of the advertisement from all channels, in all languages and  the issual of a public apology for using children in an ugly manner.



VASUDEVA SHARMA


 Director Projects , CRT - Child Rights Trust
 
Bangalore Coordinator,  Campaign Against Child Labour
 (CACL)

Bangalore

September 19, 2004

TAGS
Letter
Subscribe To The Newsletter
The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.                   

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.                 

View More