Letters to the Hoot
flippancy
in reporting ET awards in the Times of India, and lampooning Laloo
on TV suggests an elitist mindset
A Times of India report on the awards function made a racy read. But if I were
an award winner, I would not care to preserve the clipping in my scrapbook to
be shown to my grandchildren. The report (Sept.9 in Bangalore edition) was
strong on flippancy. Considering that it was the flagship paper of the
award-giving group one would have thought the Times newsreport on an in-house
function ought to have been a model of editorial decency, even at the risk of
reading like a
company report. There wasn¿t a quote on the citations.
¿ET Awards Meet Their Match¿, cries the page-one story, somewhat
presumptuously.No one, however undeserving, would want it to be rubbed in that
their corporate success was accomplished only to ¿match up¿ with the ET
standards. A touch of humility was in order. After all, ET Award is no Booker,
Pulitzer, Nobel or Arjuna of the Indian corporate world.
Pradipta Bagchi¿s news report gives a label to every notable award-winner - ¿a
journalist-turned-politician¿ for Arun Shourie, although he had had a stint in
the World Bank before he ¿turned¿ journalist.
Hero Honda chairman Brijmohan Munjal is ¿an upwardly mobile hot-wheeler¿.
Jashwantiben Popat of Lijjat is dubbed ¿a papad diva¿. Ektaa Kapoor of Balaji
Telefilms takes the cake - ¿a serial soap killer¿¿Disinvestments¿ big gun¿ Arun
Shourie gets the Business Leader or the Year
award for, as TOI reporter Bagchi would put it, ¿assiduously scrubbing the
government¿s bakeries, hotels and factories clean of malpractices before
selling them¿.
Ektaa Kapoor of Balaji Telefilms, says the TOI, has probably sold more soap
than Hindustan Lever. This is where I get a bit dense. But then I cannot claim
to be that well-versed in English.
Here is another self-serving bit - "the somewhat eclectic choice of
awardees lifted the evening beyond the usual routine of boring disclosures and
corporate back-patting". Special invitees included Raveena Tandon (she
escapes labeling) and ¿Jumping Jack¿ Jeetendra. Another report in TOI business
section said "an unassuming Jashwantiben stepped gingerly onto the stage...seized
the moment to pitch the finance minister (sitting five feet away) for tax
concessions". I wonder whether it would have made a difference if the
minister were seated fifty feet away, instead of five. And then TOI readers
were reminded that last year¿s lifetime achievement award went to that
¿dudhwala from Anand¿ Verghese Kurien. The winner this time was ¿the kisan from
Chennai¿ M S Swaminanthan. Most of us are familiar with an agriculture
scientist by the same name. A few lines down the report MSS is described as
¿eminent agriculturist¿. One wonders whether we are talking of the same person.
The TOI says that the unconventional choice of awardees proved that this year¿s
function was more than "just another awards ceremony". Whether or not
this was so the TOI account of it was certainly not just another news report. G
V Krishnan Former TOI correspondent Coonoor
September 9, 2002
Media¿s elitist mindset
This has reference to the article in thehoot.org on the protest to the serial. I have not personally seen the serial. But from what I hear, it seems to be a satire on Indian Politicians.