People’s Daily of Chennai?

BY Chandu Nair| IN Opinion | 19/03/2008
See how the recent Tibet incidents have been reported in various sections of the media on March 17.
CHANDU NAIR protests the Hindu’s playing down of unrest in Lhasa.

Dear Editor, 

See how the recent Tibet incidents have been reported in various sections of the media yesterday.

1. The Hindu

 

Lhasa returns to normality

 

China deserves to host the Olympic Games, says Dalai Lama

Unrest provoked by a few monks, lawless persons: Mayor

Investigation sought into incidents

http://www.hindu.com/2008/03/17/stories/2008031757230100.htm

2. New Indian Express

Cultural genocide on in Tibet: Dalai Lama
Monday March 17 2008

http://www.newindpress.com/NewsItems.asp?ID=IEL20080316085208&Page=H&Title=Top+Stories&Topic=0

 3. Times of India

Tibet unrest spreads beyond Lhasa, toll 16
17 Mar 2008,

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Tibet_unrest_spreads_beyond_Lhasa_toll_16/articleshow/2873129.cms

YouTube blocked in China after Tibet clips appear
16 Mar 2008,

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/World/China/YouTube_blocked_in_China_after_Tibet_clips_appear/articleshow/2871706.cms

You will note that the Hindu carries nary a word critical of the Chinese government. In fact, Ram has virtually written an ode to Chinese rule last year -  articles in The Hindu ("The Politics Of Tibet: A 2007 Reality Check", July 5, 2007) and Frontline ("Future Tibet", July 14-27, 2007), present a picture of a happy contented Tibet and he is completely supportive of Chinese policies

 Even in wikipedia, there is a point made – "The view that The Hindu does not entertain views that run contrary to its political leanings was strengthened when it refused to publish a letter by a Tibetan film-maker. The letter disputed the paper¿s editor¿s claims on Tibet and Dalai Lama". (that is given below – see thehoot.org link)

 For critical comments on his views, see these links

http://cbcnn.blogspot.com/2007/08/response-to-n-ram-on-tibet.html

http://www.friendsoftibet.org/save/

http://www.thesouthasian.org/archives/2006/the_hindu_censoring_tibet.html

http://www.thehoot.org/web/home/story.php?storyid=2627&pg=1&mod=1&sectionId=17

http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/2007/07/06/mr-ram-does-a-hatchet-job-on-the-dalai-lama/

Truly, it is a National paper- but of which nation now is the question.

 Here are a couple of comments from friends:

 "The Hindu is getting a bit under my skin for being far too pro-left/ pro-DM K , and now pro-China!  I can understand it being a liberal newspaper.  I too am a liberal at heart and even if I am not leftist, I am kind of centrist in my views.  Still, this is going too far.  The Hindu has been my favourite newspaper only for the quality of writing until recently when it has tended to go off to the far left.  I have no issues with their economic leanings or their bias to liberalism.  What grates is that they tend to distort news a bit now.  This was not the case earlier.  Maybe I am mistaken, but all they need is a good competitor and I will go off their reader list!  I read the paper for facts and in some cases opinions.  However, if facts tend to get coloured, I must revise my preferences. 

"Hindu is losing its credibility; as a newspaper it should give both views as well as news as reported."

 

Finally, Mr B Raman of the South Asia Analysis Group has called The Hindu the People’s Daily of Chennai."

 

Chandu Nair

Chennai

March 18, 2008

Subscribe To The Newsletter
The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.                   

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.                 

View More