Response to the story on the media dubbing the mosque illegal

BY Resident of Jangpura| IN Opinion | 25/01/2011
Letter to the Hoot: I was surprised to see the story "Media dubs mosque illegal without probe" and it appears that the Waqf Board view has also been carried without any cross-checks at all.
A resident of Jangpura responds.
 
 
I was surprised to see the story “Media dubs mosque illegal without probe” and it appears that the Waqf Board view (which suddenly appeared on the scene in this matter last year) has also been carried without any cross-checks at all.
 
Since i’ve been living in the said colony for many years, the facts are as follows: There was an illegal JJ cluster mostly of illegal Bangladeshis, which was razed some five years aback on court orders. One of the structures inhabited by these persons was not demolished, allegedly because it was also doubling up as a place where people from the JJ cluster (only) would come to pray.
 
Please note that at this time there was no claim in the court or elsewhere by the Waqf Board or any other entity apart from DDA, that this was their land.
 
In the last five years, this tiny structure became bigger and bigger, and only by last year, when the matter was again in court, residents could see that some other outside persons had started taking an interest and the myth of it being Waqf land suddenly started.
 
However, all along, no one from the locality itself would visit this “masjid” and indeed once the JJ cluster had been removed in 2005, all those slum-dwellers had moved far away from the colony and would not visit here.
 
In fact, all the commotion over this “masjid” is by persons from outside the locality and one would be hard put to find even 10 namazis from the locality itself.
 
Rather than building more religious structures, it is best that community development work is undertaken and the myth of victimhood of any one particular community is not falsely whipped up.
 

A resident of Jangpura

New Delhi

 

January 25,2011

Subscribe To The Newsletter
The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.                   

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.                 

View More