Why does the media not question this antiquated ritual irrelevant to modern India rather than glorifying it with uncritical coverage?
Ravish Kumar’s histrionics on NDTV are well-received while other anchors are lampooned as dangerous rabble rousers.
The British press has found that Greenpeace, besides its entertaining hyperbole, can also be misleadingly indulgent with facts.
Rajdeep Sardesai talks darkly of media persecution under Modi.
Secular liberals in the media don't realise that what seems "communal" to them - imagery, vocabulary, symbols - are merely the everyday idiolect of millions of Indians.
The Hindi press took the same stand as the English media on the Narendra Modi government's first 100 days in office, namely, measured praise.
With the odd exception, the commentaries on the budget in the Hindi daily newspapers conformed to their known partisan positions,
So how did Hindi newspapers respond to the cabinet formation and what does it think of Team Modi?
How was a move with significant repercussions for the nature of Indian bureaucracy, not subjected to critical scrutiny by the media?
Editorial commentary in the Hindi press sought to read some of the subtexts and implications of Kejriwal's resignation â€" sometimes succinctly, sometimes not,