There are instances in Bhaumik’s article which make one wonder whether it was written to defend and justify actions of the Myanmar authorities.
A one-sided story painting a picture of Shias plotting to take over is a classic example of rumour and conjecture replacing facts.
The Kerala media lavished attention on the sexual attack on the film star while ignoring the doctor whose fundamental rights were being violated.
The I&B Ministry stops three movies tackling JNU, Rohith Vemula and Kashmir from being screened.
Seven years ago, Kerala stopped giving government ads to Thejas on the grounds that the newspaper promoted religious hatred. The policy continues.
The Kerala media reported a May ruling by the Central Information Commission as ‘news’ in August. Why?
The Kerala government ups the ante by going to court over its refusal to disclose details of cabinet meetings under RTI, copying its predecessor’s stand.
Reporters covering the courts have been assaulted by lawyers, taken into police custody, and their access to the courts restricted
Kerala’s ‘Nirbhaya’ has been named and her photo published. Because of pressure from social media? Or because she was a dalit?
The issue of banning advertisements to 'Thejas' by the Kerala government is a serious issue pertaining to press freedom and pluralist media and should be discussed as such,