No more censorship in the Press Council

IN Censorship | 10/10/2011
An RTI application to demand that the Press Council of India make public its report on paid news yielded an encouraging result,
but will the regulatory body learn its lesson? A FREE SPEECH HUB report.
The Press Council of India has been directed by the Central Information Commissioner (CIC) to make public its original report on paid news and upload it on its website by October 10, 2011, striking a blow for the most craven kind of censorship from this apex self-regulatory body.
Journalist Manu Moudgil, who filed an RTI application to seek the disclosure of the report, said that the CIC has directed PCI to upload the original report on paid news on its website by October 10, 2011.
The report : “Paid News: How corruption in the Indian media undermines Indian democracy” by a sub-committee of the Press Council comprising journalists Paranjoy Guha Thakurta and K Sreenivas Reddy was submitted to the Press Council in ....2010. The report contained detailed information on paid news with testimonies from journalists, politicians and candidates who had suffered adverse or no publicity because they did not pay up for news coverage.
The report had named publications which took money from some candidates in the 2009 Lok Sabha elections to publish favourable news of them. The political parties and candidates had also clearly violated election commission guidelines on the amounts to be spent for election campaigning and the media had also violated ethics by publishing paid news as legitimate coverage. Besides, none of these transactions were official, bearing no receipts or incurring any tax expenditure.
On July 30, 2010, the Press Council, instead of publishing the report in its entirety as expected, chose to archive the report as a reference document.  It also came out with a brief report which deleted all the names of those found guilty and was full of recommendations and self regulation talk than the facts found. The new report also excluded the portion on the lacunae in the Working Journalists Act which had been pointed out in the original report, Moudgil said.
Aggrieved, he applied for the report under the RTI but the Press Council  refused to give the report under RTI claiming that it was seeking legal opinion. Even the first appellate authority refused to help and hence CIC was approached, Moudgil said.  Though the report had been leaked on the internet, not many knew about it and it remained an unofficial document.
In his order, The Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said that the council must put up the report on the website under proactive disclosure clause of the RTI Act even if it is a reference document.
The original decision can be read here.
Subscribe To The Newsletter
The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.                   

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.                 

View More