Expose corruption, flee for your life

BY jan| IN Media Freedom | 17/03/2003
A Pakistani journalist hounded by the authorities, seeks asylum in Canada.
 

Last year Shaheen Sehbai fled Pakistan for the US when the Musharraf Government began closing in on him.  This year it is the turn of Abid Ullah Jan who has sought asylum in Canada. Excerpts from an account he has just written in South Asia Tribune, a webzine Sehbai started from the US last year: "Another Journalist Flees Pakistan and seeks Asylum in Canada".
http://www.satribune.com/archives/mar02_08_03/P1_abidjan.htm

                                        

 

Abid Ullah Jan

 

MONTREAL, Canada: "This column is out after a self-imposed silence of more than two months, all spent in assessing the pros and cons of telling the truth. I am sorry that I didn’t inform most of my well wishers for the simple reason that I felt embarrassed to say that I am leaving the country because the government of my motherland does not want me to live in peace any more.

 

A lot has happened in - and to - Pakistan during this period of my silence. A lot has happened with me, too. I see my ordeal as a reflection of much that is wrong with the way our nation is being governed. For months, I went through the mental torture planned for me by the government agents and finally I experienced for 50 hours, the pain caused by unidentified officials, operating in secrecy, accountable to no one.

 

This is the story that I didn’t even tell my close friends and relatives because I thought it would soon be over and because until recently I couldn’t link it up to my 4-part investigative report, "Exposing the Tip of Corruption Iceberg," which was published in Peshawar Daily Frontier Post on January 9, 10, 11 and 12. Those who refer back to that report would know the top ranking government officials who were involved in the biggest ever scam in the

development sector. Interestingly the corruption iceberg still exists and my exposing its tip has only cost me my career.

 

The high ranking officials who were part of the story that I exposed included personalities such as the additional Chief Secretary NWFP, Director General Sustainable Development Unit, PE&D NWFP, Project Director Mansehra Village Support Program (MVSP), etc. More

interestingly, the governor was the chief supporter of the corrupt officials in the government and office bearers of the NGO, now called Sarhad Rural Support Program (SRSP). Their respective role is clearly outlined in my original 2001 report."

 

                         

                                          *        *          *         

 

"The governor used military personals in a skilful way. Initially they used to come and harass me in the form of asking financial reports and legal status of my organization They would ask

for illegal experience certificates for their family members so that they could frame me with that later on. Even civilians in the ISI would come to ask for the best available vehicles in my organization for taking their guests to Swat, etc.

 

Nothing worked. Finally, they got the right opportunity in the form of my anti-Musharraf articles. After appearance of my book "A war on Islam?" and my pro-democracy articles in Pakistan Weekly and SA Tribune in US, ISI got a golden opportunity to interrogate and

threaten my and my family on almost weekly basis.

 

They spent huge amounts of public funds on an enterprise, which brought no gain to the country and failed even in securing its mean and limited objective. If the purpose of spying on my activities, phone tapping, kidnapping, and detaining me was to secure my silence, the government has failed (once again) to achieve its target. Here I am, totally unrepentant, voicing my opinions again.

 

I was kidnapped on November 24 from my home in Peshawar at around 10:00 a.m. We were just around to begin our day when our house was surrounded by several vehicles. I was dragged out of my house, wrapped in a blanket and taken to an unknown place. My

kidnappers refused to identify themselves or to tell me what they wanted. I was blind-folded and my face was covered with a black hood. The blindfold did not come off for the 12 hours when I was taken to a basement where I was tied to a chair but mercifully not beaten up.

 

`Why do you want to be a leader`, my chief tormentor asked me without giving me a chance to reply. I was told where I had been during the past week and references were made to recent telephone conversations of mine.My captors wanted me to know that they had followed me and listened to my telephone conversations. I knew they were well-informed.

 

I was kept up all night and moved to another location in the early hours of the morning. All day long I was questioned about Shaheen Sehbai, Khwaja Ashraf, General Hamid Gul, Imran (aka Abu Abdullah), who published my book, and a few names which I didn’t know but they

were associating these with former Prime Minister, Nawaz Sharif. After much questioning, I was left alone for the next 12 hours. I was set free on November 26, after being threatened to the maximum possible degree and showing the maximum respect in the form of repeatedly calling me "Sir."

 

From the moment of my publishing the initial report about massive corruption in the name of poverty alleviation - which the Governor NWFP took personally - till my abduction, dozens of government functionaries performed the tasks of visiting my office, chasing me around, "investigating," etc. How secure can a government be if it has to deploy so many people to deal with an "insignificant" columnist? Before dropping me at Hayat Abad, one of my kidnappers had whispered to me "Remember, we took only a few seconds to nab you. That should instil some fear in you and make you act in your own interest". I must confess I am very scared. But I fear more for my country and my innocent family members than for myself."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TAGS
expose
Subscribe To The Newsletter
The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.                   

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.                 

View More