Mapping media oppression in
( Full study available at MappingPakistan.doc
A Panos-Hoot study
Author: Sevanti Ninan
Research Assistance: Shayoni Sarkar,
Deepti Bharthur
After their trial by fire during the last year of Musharraf¿s leadership, the media in
In a statement issued on February 21, the PFUJ also welcomed the decision to lift ban on six TV anchors and hoped that the future government would respect media freedom and abolish all ¿black laws¿ against the media, including the two ordinances promulgated after November 3. According to the statement, four of the six TV anchors will be back on air from Friday and the two others a little later.
A few days before the elections took place the Hoot completed a survey of three years of attacks on the Pakistani media in a effort to determine what the major constraints are to media practice in this country. It was an effort to seek patterns in the way press freedom was being eroded. The survey was based entirely on the daily documentation that the Pakistan Press Foundation does of attacks on the press and the electronic media. It took into account a total of 183 incidents relating to news media, and 78 attacks on music and film have been analyzed. It covers the period from January 2005 to December 2007, chronicles the growing oppression, and takes into account all incidents which occurred, which were not accidental, but acts of commission.
For the purpose of this study perpetrators of incidents against the media have been classified in three categories: Fundamentalist, State, and Other. In 2005, the number of incidents were 48, at a conservative estimate.The break up of perpetrators is as follows: 32 were state agencies of various kinds, 4 have been categorized as fundamentalist, and 12 fall in the category of other.
In 2006 there were a total of 43 incidents, fundamentalist 4, state 26, and 14 other.In 2007 the total number of incidents was 92. Eleven fall in the category of fundamentalist, 54 are incidents in which the state figures as oppressor, and 27 are classified as other.
In all three years the state and its various arms—the government, judiciary, intelligence, and army—were bigger perpetrators than the fundamentalists and others combined. And the police, who were the perpetrators in a total of 45 incidents, were by far the single biggest category of oppressors.
Other major agents of censorship were the Pakistan Electronic Media Authority (PEMRA), Pakistan Telecommunication Authority(PTA), agencies imposing bans, departments which issued press advice, the suspension of government advertising to the media, closures and cancellation of declaration, denial of information, and the barring of journalists from collecting news. (See tables in full report.)
Oppression by the fundamentalists was more to curb cultural products such as video and audio cds, and films, rather than aimed at news media. Its occurrence grew ferociously in the year 2007. Large number of unidentified oppressors makes it difficult to enumerate attacks by fundamentalists.
Sindh most affected province
Geographically incidents of news media oppression were the most frequent in Sindh province, followed by NWFP and
In 2005, police got after the press for exposing their acts in Mirpur Khas, in Sindh, for violating the official secrets act in
In 2006 several attacks on life and limb took place in Sindh. One scribe was shot dead in Larkana by armed tribes for covering their clashes. Another was kidnapped and tortured in Nawabshah by influential landlords. Yet another has his eyebrows removed, and was beaten and humiliated in
Incidents of cultural oppression were concentrated in the
As journalist Ashfaq Yusufzai reported for Inter Press Service from
He added, according to news reports, a video shop in front of a police station in Bannu, the hometown of the NWFP chief minister Akram Durrani, was attacked by armed men suspected to be Taliban on Feb. 27, who destroyed CD players and CDs of Urdu, English and Indian films.
Through the whole of 2005 there were no incidents. Then in November, there was the first one in the
"Reports from Swat said more than 250 television sets were put to the fire in union council Malookabad, located within the limits of Mingora city. The television sets, along with VCRs, CDs and music and movies videos were piled up and burnt in a bonfire. The crowd, which included the union council Malookabad nazim Fazal Jalal, raised slogans of Allah-o-Akbar when the flames of fire leapt into the air and turned the heap into ashes."
As the report puts it this act is a response to a local maulana linking the October 8 earthquake which devastated the region, as a "sign of Allah¿s displeasure with our sins and way of life." He urged the people to cleanse their homes of the instruments of obscenity and start living life in accordance with teachings of Islam. And, apparently almost everyone in the area heeded his advice. The News said similar incidents had also been reported from a few other places in the NWFP.
In 2006 there are incidents in January, February, March June and August, a total of six. Three of these are reported from the
In 2007, fundamentalist ire against sinful media picks up steam, beginning with no incidents in January and ending with 23 in December alone. Early in the year the Mujahadeen ban music on buses in the Bajaur agency in Fatah.
Throughout the year thereafter there is a steady incidence of the burning of CD and video shops and attacks on cable operators. Ten in April seven in May and seven in June. In December there is an explosion of incidents. Both audio and video cassette shops are destroyed.
The largest number of incidents are recorded in the
The shape of censorship
Press freedom through these three years was circumscribed by the following, documentation of which in available in the full report.
By orders from PEMRA
Non PEMRA closures
Bans and Blocks
Press Advice
Suspension of advertising
Censorship, information denied
Information gathering barred
THE ROLE OF PEMRA
The Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority progressed through 2005 to 2007 from taking action against radio and tv channels carrying foreign programmes in 2005, to clamping down on illegal FM radio stations run by religious and sectarian groups in 2006, to coming down heavily on the domestic private channels in 2007, empowered for this by an ordinance. Given the turmoil on the domestic front beginning from March 2007 PEMRA was used by the government from April onwards to block transmissions and threaten private TV stations with closure. In this year there were no actions against fundamentist radio stations, all energies were concentrated on preventing news and criticism of government actions.
Through these three years the action from PEMRA was centered in
Then there were non PEMRA closures affecting the media. In
Filed by Mubarik Ali Chaudhry, chairman of the Awami Hamayat Tehrik,
When three television news channels went off the air on May 5, 2007 in Karachi depriving viewers in Karachi and southern Sindh of the live coverage of the caravan of Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry proceeding to Lahore from Islamabad, officials of the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) denied any instructions had been issued to stop the transmission of the channels.
International news channels BBC and CNN went off the air in the country in November, then there was a shut down of Geo News from
Bans AND BLOCKS
Bans ranged across all categories of media in
Press advice, Closures/cancellation of declarations, Censorship / information denied, INFORMATION GATHERING BARRED
For documentation of all of these please see the full report.
Conclusion:
The challenge of restoring media freedom to
1) Taking a look, at the highest level of decision-making, at how the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority should be recast to make it constructive rather than punitive in its regulatory approach. Giving it an independent leadership with adequate representation from media practitioners and owners. Also making banning of TV and radio stations and censorship and closures of TV, radio and press, a multi-level process so that ti cannot be arbitrarily implemented.
2) The government needs to send a clear message down the line to the institution of the police that attacks on the media will not be tolerated and will be punished.
3) The same police have to be enjoined with protecting journalists as they carry out their professional duties. Cable operators and video and cd shops need to be given far greater protection to continue their business, in the border areas.
Having said this, all of the above is a very tall order. And it has to be borne in mind that the Nawaz Sharif government when it was in power also had a record of attacks on the press. Nothing short of reviewing constitutional safeguards on media independence and strengthening judicial mechanisms for implementing these safeguards, will provide the institutional framework required for more media freedom in