Order or question?

IN Media Watch Briefs | 28/10/2016

The 7-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court asked if, and didn't say that, secularism was aloofness, during a hearing on a case. But the Times of India headline implies an order which it was not. The media tendency to report questions or observations made in court misleads readers. Curiously, the courts are silent on such reports.

TAGS

Supreme Court 7-judge Constitution secularism media

Subscribe To The Newsletter

Media Watch Briefs

Amazon resisting voluntary censorship

The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.

Let the games begin

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.