The next time you read an article in the newspaper, how sure are you that it's news--and not an advertisement? The line between news and ads was blurred--almost erased, in fact---by TOI (dated 15-01-2012) and ET (16-01-2012). Both papers recently frontpaged an article on Functional Manual Therapy (FMT), which was actually very advertorial in nature. TOI used a font similar to that used in news reports, and made no clear demarcation. TOI also mentioned that FMT is an initiative of the Times group in collaboration with The Institute of Physical Art quite early, although the ET did it much later in the report. But does a media house initiative with commercial interests deserve editorial space?