Unfair and misleading

IN Media Watch Briefs | 13/12/2010
On December 12 the Bangalore Edition of Sunday Times carried a small blurb at the bottom of page 1. The title read "Binayak Sen Linked with terrorists". The article talked of the prosecutor's assertion in court that Binayak Sen and his wife were linked to terrorists. The short para ends with "Details on Page 8". It's only when you ignore the main headline on Page 8 and read the article that you find out that the article is about the prosecution confusing the Indian Social Institute for the ISI. The page 1 piece is about as badly presented as the prosecution's case.
Subscribe To The Newsletter
The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.                   

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.                 

View More