Which one spoke?

IN Media Watch Briefs | 19/07/2014

Makes sense if a joint interview indicates which of the interviewees responded to which question. Or else it confuses the reader for two persons cannot say everything in unison, word to word. But The Times of India doesn't think it mattered. The Q&A on its edit page with CS Krishna and Karthik Laxman on satire does not specify this. If it were a joint reply to emailed questions, it could be assumed one spoke for the two, or both drafted the responses, but that is not mentioned either.

TAGS

CS Krishna and Karthik Laxman times of india

Subscribe To The Newsletter

Media Watch Briefs

Amazon resisting voluntary censorship

The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.

Let the games begin

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.