Which version to believe?

IN Media Watch Briefs | 01/12/2016
A reader points out that an incident of murder in Delhi was reported both  by the Times of India and the Hindi paper Hindustan  but the versions were very different. TOI said the  young man killed his elder brother because of being asked to leave his home late at night to allow his brother and girlfriend to be alone. The Hindustan said he killed his elder brother because of repeated nagging by him to study more. Asks the reader, how is this possible when the source of news should be Delhi Police for both reporters?                                 
            
Subscribe To The Newsletter
The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.                   

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.                 

View More