When it comes to reporting the news on the Kosi river, one wonders why Indian journalists commit the same kind of error year after year after year. What is all the more striking is that one gets to see more news on the Kosi barrage under the control and operation by Government of Bihar emerging from Nepal-based media houses rather than in the Indian media. Even after a major deluge that we witnessed following the breach in the embankment upstream of the Kosi barrage, the Indian media has learnt no lessons.
So even as we would be told that how the union budget disappointed Bihar CM Nitish Kumar and the BJP by not making a fund allocation for the rehabilitation of the victims of the Kosi flood or how the Water Resources minister of Bihar state has allocated Rs 705 crores towards the reconstruction of the Kosi canal system damaged during last year, we wouldn’t be told about what is the actual picture on the Kosi barrage front. 10
It is indeed an irony that taking the cover of the Kosi flood havoc last year, more structural interventions are envisaged by Pranab Babu who increased the budget allocation for flood control by 44.48 percent [Rs 210.75 crore compared to last year’s allocation of Rs 145.90 crore], little realizing that the tragedy last year was unfolded due to the very embankments that he as well as Bihar’s Water Resource minister is pushing for as a panacea. 11
On May 5th, in a one column news The Times of India reported on the conclusions arrived at a two day meeting of Indo Nepal Joint Committee on Kosi-Gandak project viz to protect the barrages of Gandak and Kosi with proper upkeep and use. A fortnight later one would witness conflicting reports in the Indian media. Varunkumar Mishra of
Within a week thereafter, we witnessed the news trickling in from Nepal-based papers that the river got increased flow following four days of incessant rains in the catchment and started gnawing up a coffer dam that was built to channelize the river flow in order to carry out the repairs of the breached embankment at Kusaha. We witnessed Rediff doing a sensational headline Kosi changes its course while quoting news from Nepal News. The CNN-IBN reporter Prabhakar Kumar covered the story a couple of days later with bytes from the
Even as the month of June passed by and one witnessed more and more coverage of vulnerable portions of embankments along river in Nepal, floodgates in bad shape at barrage and the flood level rising at barrage, the Indian media appeared so much in love with press statements emerging from Patna that it hardly bothered to see on the other side of the Kosi barrage.
On June 29th Abadhesh Kumar Jha, Sunsari based correspondent of Kantipur quoted Raju Bhagat, a control room employee at barrage stating "Earlier, with the increase in water level, we used to press a switch at the control room to open the gates, these days we cannot operate even a single gate that way". Within days after that Kantipur reported on the river beginning to breach a spur in Madhuwan region and emergency announced at Kosi barrage as the water flow crossed 1.84 lakh cusecs by Friday morning. On July 3rd Ajit Tiwari reported in Republica about raging Kosi river breaching one of the gates.
However, compare these with the news stories that appeared in Indian media around the same dates. On July 1st, a story filed by Sudhir Kumar of Samay Live stated that several villages in Saraigarh and Kiranpur blocks witnessed flood like situation on Tuesday night as
On July 3rd, 2009 a news release by IANS does mention that an embankment of Bagmati river in Aurai block was breached resulting in inundation of several villages on Thursday. However, on Kosi it just reported what came to it from the honourable minister. But if you compare what
More recently on July 5th, Kantipur reported that Indian technicians led by K N Lal, senior mechanical engineer Bihar state visited the Kosi barrage and stated that people from Joseph and Company Ltd, the firm that constructed the gates in 1962, have been called to undertake much needed repair work of all 56 sluice gates, one of which was ravaged by high waters recently.
So will the hydrocracy of
The author works with Environics Trust,