Earlier this month, a journalist friend of mine visited the POSCO site in Orissa to report what was happening there for a Malayalam daily. She was accompanied by five other women, human rights activists from non- governmental organisations in
The next day, a local Oriya newspaper reported that six Maoist women -- some of them pretending to be media people -- came the previous night and camped at the rally site to give arms training to the tribals. While the local newspaper report is an example of one kind of media distortion, the coverage of the rally (or its non-coverage) in the English media is equally worrying.
News about the rally came in the "Non-Event" section of a regional edition of The Times of India. Its
The Indian Express,
It was only The Hindu that did a decent reporting of the event. "Rally against Orissa steel project staged; government criticised": The Hindu,
Then there was an eye-witness account in Tehelka that does not quite
qualify as mainstream English media. "State of
government support for the POSCO steel plant, hundreds of protestors
stormed police barricades in Orissa¿s Dhinkia. An eye-witness account
by MANSHI ASHER"
http://www.tehelka.com/story_main38.asp?filename=cr190408stateof.asp
Native resistance to big projects and the resulting displacement does not have news value any more, unless it happens in a state where a communist party rules. In the rush to globalize and to get things done at low cost (which most often means without compensating adequately for the resources), such struggles have become commonplace. And there are many Nandigram-like situations in many states in
Talking of displacements and people¿s resistances, it is not new to Orissa either. The local resistance to a big mining project in Kashipur is over 15 years old and a brutal police crackdown on tribals there happened only about three years back. http://www.miningwatch.ca/index.php?/Kashipur_Bauxite/Utkal_update_PSSP_122004
We know how Nandigram has been used by the media against CPM. The likes of The Indian Express initially took a line similar to the stand they took on POSCO -- explaining why we need industrialization at any cost, and how the armed locals and "naxalites" stood in the way of a bold Buddha. But later it became difficult to stick to that stand after the situation got much worse. In a clever manner, they mixed it well with the criticism on CPM and the Left for becoming a hindrance on the liberal economy expressway. The larger question of whether our future really lies in such big projects continues to remain unexplored by and undebated in most of the mainstream press.
.