Scindia, Phoolan Devi And The Media

BY S.Anand| IN Media Practice | 16/03/2002
Scindia, Phoolan Devi And The Media

Scindia, Phoolan Devi And The Media

By S.Anand

The death of four journalists along with Madhavrao Scindia was mourned by the media. But nobody has asked the question, what were these journalists were doing with Scindia on a private flight? That the four journalists who accompanied Scindia morally compromised themselves has not been seen as an issue by any media critic.

The death of four journalists along with Madhavrao Scindia was mourned by the media. But nobody has asked the question what these journalists – Anju Sharma of The Hindustan Times, Sanjiv Sinha of the Indian Express, Ranjan Jha of the television news channel Aaj Tak, and Gopal Bisht, cameraman for Aaj Tak – were doing with Scindia on a private flight. Veterans of the political beat take pride in their contacts with big netas – ostensibly for news, but also for ‘plants’ and other favours that come along, sometimes unasked for. Reporters covering a party fall in love with it; they lose all perspective and begin to behave like party spokespersons; and they would go to any length to oblige leaders they get close to.Fellow-journalists may disapprove of my wrong sense of timing in raising this issue, but Scindia’s death and the fact that four journalists died with him, I think forces us – at least those of us who believe in ethics and responsibility, and in criticising ourselves – to get some perspective on what is happening.

On September 30, 2001, Scindia (who was carelessly described by most television and newspaper reporters as ‘Maharaja’ though this monarchic-feudal institution has been scrapped) was flying to Kanpur for a Congress rally. How important was this rally for four Delhi journalists to fly along? Could not Indian Express or HT have deputed their Kanpur reporters to do the job? Why did Sanjeev Sinha or Anju Sharma have to fly all the way? Did they go to Kanpur when Muslims were killed there some months ago? Why not then, why now? How much space/time would Express, HT or Aaj Tak have given to Scindia’s rally – what was the rally all about anyway? A single column in the papers, if at all; and 20 seconds perhaps on the TV channel. Would we have known at all about the Scindia rally had not the plane crashed and all onboard died? If there had been no mishap, we would perhaps have never known that Anju Sharma, Sanjiv Sinha, Ranjan Jha and Gopal Bisht had made the trip.On the day of the death, Congress leader Priyaranjan Dasmunshi broke down while being interviewed by Rajdeep Sardesai for Star News. Besides mourning the death of Scindia, he was equally pained by the death of "Ranjon" who, he told us, used to come to him (Dasmunshi) and Scindia every morning for dope. Such politician-journalist intimacy is vulgar, to say the least.

That the four journalists who accompanied Scindia morally compromised themselves has not been seen as an issue by any media critic. Most mediapersons tend to see this as part of their job. In the process of cultivating contacts, reporters get ‘close’ to powerful persons and have to nurture these ‘contacts’, is the reasoning. This, at best, helps one access information/ soundbytes at the right moment. One can hardly term a trip to Kanpur a ‘junket’ – that term is reserved only for foreign trips which result from being ‘close’ to officials in the ministry of external affairs. And for these junkets there is great lobbying even within a publication. Such trips are shared by senior, accredited journalists who toe the government’s foreign policy line. This of course means only journalists who operate from Delhi.

Right now, being in the good books of home minister L.K. Advani could mean he takes you along to the annual Sindhu Darshan, an out-and-out hindutva-RSS affair. Flying to Kanpur with Scindia might hardly be on a par with such exercises. But obliging Scindia here could mean a lot to the journalists involved on some other occasion. It is another thing that neither survived the trip to be able to enjoy the professional perks that would have accrued on some later date.

Subscribe To The Newsletter
The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.                   

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.                 

View More