Remembering Vinod Mehta

BY PARANJOY GUHA THAKURTA| IN Opinion | 08/03/2015
He could, and did, stand up against the might of the richest industrialist, the most powerful politician and the highly influential bureaucrat to uphold journalistic ethics and media freedom, like few before him.
PARANJOY GUHA THAKURTA and AJITH PILLAI kick off a series of tributes on The Hoot

Brutally frank about his own follies         Paranjoy Guha Thakurta

Vinod Mehta was much more than one of India's greatest journalists. He was one of the most candid and transparent individuals I have ever known, a person who could bare his innermost secrets to the world at  large, who could write about a daughter he had but never met, who could confess how his error of editorial judgement cost him his job in the now-defunct Independent newspaper, and how he was humiliated by the late industrialist Lalit Mohan Thapar who owned the Pioneer. There are few of us -- including this correspondent -- who can be as brutally frank about his own follies and foibles as Vinod was. Yes, despite our difference in age, I only addressed him by his first name.

 His childlike simplicity and his candour belied his guts of steel. He could, and did, stand up against the might of the richest industrialist, the most powerful politician and the highly influential bureaucrat to uphold journalistic ethics and media freedom, like few before him. His own accounts of his relations with Ratan Tata, Atal Behari Vajpayee and Brajesh Mishra (to name only three individuals) bear testimony to a journalist who cared more about his readers than anyone else, not even his employers. Every time he was sacked and insulted, he emerged all the more stronger and gutsier. He stood by his subordinates before the outside world, even when he knew they were wrong. There are few on this planet who was loved so much by even those who disagreed vehemently with his views. The word "liberal" is much used and abused but he fitted the description better than most others.

 I consider it my honour and privilege that I worked under him for a little over five years in the first half of the 1990s. I owe more than a case of the best Single Malt Whiskey money can buy for all that I  learnt from him -- about what to do and what not. For many years after we ceased being colleagues, he would rib me and joke with me whenever our paths would cross. And he was always frank to a fault -- like the time he told me why he could not carry a story against the Ambanis because he had already just antagonised them and did not want to do so again in quick succession in deference to the wishes of the owners of the weekly he edited. 

The last few occasions we bumped into each other, he seemed a littleless steady on his feet. But his sharp wit was intact. In  late-November, I was suitably flattered when I received a phone call from him inviting me for the launch of the second part of his memoirs, "Editor Unplugged", on 12 December. Little did I realise then that the launch would not take place and that it would be the last time I would speak to him.                  

                               Vinod’s winning  formula               Ajith Pillai 

I was chief of bureau with India Today in Chennai when I got a call from Vinod Mehta. Was I interested in a job in Delhi? He was launching a magazine and he would like me on the team. I said that sounded good. “Then just catch the next flight to Delhi,” he said over long distance. I booked my ticket without even giving it a second thought or saying a word at home. Having worked with him at the Sunday Observer, Indian Post and The Pioneer I knew my move to the national capital would be an exciting one.

But was there space for a magazine? Would Vinod last out or would he quit even before the new publication was launched? I was hounded by such questions at the Delhi Press Club. When I got back to Chennai I was told by well wishers that I was taking a risk by leaving an established brand like India Today and joining a magazine with an uncertain and shaky future.

In those days Outlook operated from two stuffy rooms at the now defunct Lodhi Hotel. There was nothing to do but order kadhi chawal at lunch time from the dhaba nearby and flip aimlessly through back issues of other magazines. Amidst all this inactivity and frustration there was only person who was confident—Vinod Mehta. One afternoon I asked him the question that was often put to me--is there a market for a new magazine? He said that if we got our act right we could succeed. “Start thinking and stop eating kadhi-chawal,” he said obviously trying to lighten my mood.

The magazine was an immediate hit once it was launched. Vinod had simply gone back to his time tested formula of giving good stories a chance. Reporters, photographers, artists and the desk had to work in tandem to beat the competition. Across the magazine there was a sincere commitment to bringing great stories to the table. As a team we clicked. I had seen that happen at the Observer. In fact, Outlook did not break new ground. It just held on to value based journalism, unfettered by market forces. That was the winning formula that kick started it.

Subscribe To The Newsletter
The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.                   

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.                 

View More