Reporting Gujarat: what the Editors Guild found:

BY Gobind Thukral| IN Opinion | 22/04/2002
Reporting Gujarat: what the Editors Guild found:

Reporting Gujarat: what the Editors Guild found:


While the team found the vernacular Press partly responsible for sowing the seeds of discord and helping the communal virus to spread fast, it had good words for the national Press and major TV  networks


Coverage on Gujarat carnage in both print and electronic media has attracted immense attention. The issue had become so important the Editor`s Guild had to rush a team to make an on-the-spot assessment and suggest corrective measures. While the team found the vernacular Press partly responsible for sowing the seeds of discord and helping the communal virus to spread fast, it had good words for the national Press and major TV networks.

Interestingly, the BJP Government and a section of its police and other officers were more critical of the national Press and ignored, despite available powers under the law, rumour mongering by some newspapers in Ahmedabad, Vadodara and other places. Clearly, this suited their interests and showed their indoctrination to a particular ideology of Hindutva.

With television presenting instant powerful images, the role of the media has assumed greater significance. News is shown as it happens. But the media can colour the events by using them or by not using them at all. By being selective, it often misinforms and acts as a propaganda tool. What gives the media a complex dimension is the daily exposure of multiple items in juxtaposition. Nevertheless, the media remains a major source of information, particularly in a violent situation.

How did the local Press presented the riots to the readers? Has the print media in any way aggravated the relentless tensions through inflammatory or communal reportage? These questions bother all right thinking people.

We are all aware what the national Press reported; we have also watched the reports of major national TV networks. But what were the local papers reporting? The role of Gujarati newspapers like Sandesh (Baroda), Gujarat Samachar (Baroda) and Gujarat Today were analysed for the purpose. Concerned citizens, Shanti, painstakingly collected data for the study.

Sandesh crossed all limits of responsible journalism. Its major characteristic was to feed on the prevalent anti-Muslim prejudices of its Hindu readership and provoke it further by sensationalising and distorting news. Sandesh used headlines to provoke, communalise and terrorise people.

Most reports concerning the post-Godhra violence usually begin with a preceding sentence, `In the continuing spiral of communal rioting that broke out as a reaction to the `demonic/barbaric, Godhra incident...`. The denunciatory adjectives used liberally to describe the Godhra incident were strikingly absent while reporting subsequent killings. Introductory statement reinforces an hierarchy in the two sets of crimes. This hierarchy has been established by the VHP and even Chief Minister Narendra Modi when he justified the genocide in Newtonian terms. This brings to the fore the supposed objectivity of Sandesh as a newspaper. Repetitive justification of the post-Godhra violence serves to neutralise the horror and injustice of the subsequent violence.

The most horrific acts of violence were repeatedly sensationalised with the use of a few devices. For example, large bold letters were used as headlines particularly when referring to gruesome acts like the burning alive of people. Photographs of burnt, mangled bodies were a common feature on the front page or the last page which usually carries local news. Most colour photos have the colour of red for blood accentuated in a gory, visual fashion. Alternatively, photographs of militant, trishul wielding karsevaks were splashed across the front page. Both kinds of photographs serve to instill fear or terror and to provoke intense passions and mutual hostility between the two communities.

Subscribe To The Newsletter
The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.                   

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.                 

View More