Ignoring editor's harassment?

IN Media Watch Briefs | 06/02/2015

"Hounded Urdu editor unable to return home", says the Times of India in a front-page second lead on February 6.  This is a continuing Mumbai story which other media seem reluctant to play up. The Hindustan Times follows up the story on page 15  same day, but anything prominent on it in other papers is hard to find. Though the Mumbai Press Club has supported her case, the Editors' Guild and other journalists'  bodies are silent on the subject, even though she was arrested on January 28, released on bail and has had to continuously seek bail as fresh FIRs are being filed against her. These are filed by members of the Muslim community.  Would the media reaction countrywide to similar harassment by, say, saffron groups, have been as subdued?

Subscribe To The Newsletter
The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.                   

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.                 

View More